i really regret to inform you that i've hit the lazy lull....oh so lovely, lazy, summer space. something i've actually never experienced. the truth is this: on the one hand, i'm relishing this time, strange, personal time, personal time without angst of marriage, occupation, children. for example: i am now on (wait, i must check) day 41 without smokes. and, i might add, at least a few of these days have been spent with friends i previously smoked with, up late talking and drinking, and still, i do not smoke. promising.
i'm actually a bit confused and i guess therein lies the angst of this summer time. confused because i just finished an article and i'm reading but not intensely. like not seriously difficult theoretical material that demands my every fiber. some of it is really enjoyable (like anna karenina, which i'm teaching in the fall but haven't read in some time now) and some of it is re-reading work i should know inside and out for my sub-field but don't because i immersed myself in my diss work for so long.
then there is the angst of starting this thing called a job. i know the teeny tiny violins will come out. but like all transitions, this one feels uncomfortable. for one thing, i don't know how to work in an office. i'm used to working in my messy bedroom in my bed clothes, without showering, and when i need to think or am stuck, walking around my house (i used to go outside for a smoke) or cleaning my kitchen or something else mundane. now i sit in this space i am grateful to be given and look around. i listen to all of the new noises and smell the newly painted rooms, and sometimes pace the hallway just to remind myself of where i am. today is the first day that i was able to read, seriously read. and this was, i think, the fourth time i've spent in this space.
lazy? confused? angsty? who cares i suppose. but this is my summer. lovely and slow on the one hand but confused and still anxious on the other. only less so. but because i'm able to relax for the first time in a few years and because there are some legitimate reasons to feel worry (new job, being a PARTNER), i only feel grey.
being a partner: sucks. it will always feel illegitimate. it will always feel subordinate. it will always feel bifurcated. PARTNER. my body screams in hallways. i try to ignore it. i try to listen to mr. whore who says all the things a good partner should: this couldn't happen if you didn't do the work, now you need to believe that and move forward. whatever. we're trained to not believe anything, it is part of our critical nature, no? especially something like self-worth.
i feel like an alien. and i know that i will for a long time. the only way it will ever change is if we leave this institution or when my book comes out it is critically revered. i don't have high hopes for either of these.
and i confess, it hurts just a wee bit to know that this will always shadow me even while i know it also helped me.
woe to the academic.
new title anyone? i'm soliciting opinions. i'm looking for something snarky, of course.
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



10 comments:
That's Mister Coattails to you, thank you very much. Seriously, it's a matter of circumstance. My wife's a damn smart medievalist. I'm an Americanist. Doesn't matter what I do, I'm going to be taking the Coattail Express into a position somewhere or other. I know this should bother me, but it doesn't. Some people were born rich, went to Harvard, and benefit from the Ivy bias -- I somehow managed to marry above my intellectual station. Neither's any more legitimate than the other.
ok, so you know I love you, right?
now get over it, K? Seriously. Let's play a game. The game where we remember that the opportunity to get hired may have been because you have a connection in the Dept. (and, let's be perfectly honest, that is a situation that happens for more tenuous reasons than partners all the time...friends of committee members...friends or colleagues of Dr. Big Wig in the Dept. etc. etc.), but the actually getting hired part? That was all you. Period. End of discussion. Because you (not Mr. Whore...) ROCK!
And if you need more proof, just remember that not all people who get the opportunity to try out actually make the team. I may even be married to one of them...
So, I guess we can all feel this way if it stems from the fact that some form of interpersonal connection has played a part in getting a job interview or an article published or an award nomination or a grant proposal positively vetted....
just sayin'
^What Rumpus said!^
Actually, I know and understand your response; indeed, I think I would feel the same way. But at the same time that I felt it, I would know it was irrational. We tend to hold ourselves to higher standards than others -- you likely wouldn't judge a friend or colleague by this standard, sniffing, "Oh, s/he's a partner hire" -- but you do it to yourself.
The fact is, there are a million reasons why people get hired, or not hired, into an academic position. Many of these reasons have to do with politics, various fault lines in departments, personalities, topical strengths and weaknesses... and very few of them have to do with the Absolute Pure Superiority of the Candidate. Every job, partner or not, works within these norms.
Good to see you back!
thanks, ya'll for your sympathy, kind words, pep talk.
as lil'r says: i'll get over it!!
Lady, I am so happy to hear that you are rocking teh lazy. Good for you.
No comment about the above stuff. I've never seen an actual partner hire, let alone one that was solely about keeping academic A from leaving, so I don't actually believe that's what happened to you. (okay, I guess that was a comment.)
Congrats on kicking the smokes for longer than Jesus sojourned in the wilderness, similarly avoiding temptations, though I have to say, I'm not even a smoker and I have been DYING for a smoke lately. And I seriously can't have one. I don't care what the public service ads say: when I see people smoking on the street, I think they *do* look cool.
m darling: clarify your non-comment....it confuses me:)
Can't add much to the good comments above; but -- why do you have to work in your office? Is this local culture? Many academics continue to work (i.e. write) at home, and spend time in the office only on teaching days. You're much more likely to get interrupted. So mostly work at home.
susan: well, i was thinking that it would be good for me to learn to work away from home, kids, and all the time suck that home becomes. i'm sure i still will write at home when i'm there alone it just often is not the case.
thus, i'm trying new habits!
By my non-comment I meant that your "partner" hire wouldn't have happened if you weren't qualified and kick ass and didn't have things to bring to the dept. And that the fact that partner hires are so rare means they only happen when all the stars align and the person being brought in shits gold. But yeah, the comment confused me too as I was writing it. I guess I hoped you'd assume that you were at fault for not understanding my brilliance and just let it slide. Like reading theory. xoxoxox
thanks for that fabulous clarification--for implying that i shit gold and mostly for making me laugh.
you must send out a mass post, or just to me!, when wee one arrives. have you a name for her yet?
remember--sex. orgasm works.
Post a Comment